At first thought, it might seem that the richest and most powerful people would have the best chance of weathering the events of the coming century. With enough money, they could buy a hilltop fortress, or erect security fences, or build private solar power stations, or hire guards and gardeners, or do a hundred other things to maintain themselves. This reasoning is sound up to a point: wealthy individuals could in fact become local warlords, the power holders in a feudal ‘Mad Max’ society of the future.


However, wealth in and of itself will confer no guarantee of well-being. After a certain point, money is likely to lose value, and immediately useful goods will instead become the basis of trade. Moreover, many currently wealthy individuals are not equipped to do as well as industrial civilization collapses: they are even more dependent than most other people on electronic gadgetry, long-distance travel, and a smoothly functioning social system. Imagine, for example, the plight of the well-off Manhattan stockbroker, or the Hong Kong currency trader, when lights go out and food shipments to local supermarkets are interrupted.

Richard Heinberg, Powerdown: Options and Actions for a Post-Carbon World (via cultureofresistance)

(via solitaryforager)

Source: mikroblogolas

28 Notes/ Hide

  1. parkstepp reblogged this from lifting-of-the-veil
  2. lifting-of-the-veil reblogged this from solitaryforager
  3. totallydarius reblogged this from solitaryforager
  4. sankayadeadmon reblogged this from solitaryforager
  5. im-a-leaf-in-the-wind reblogged this from solitaryforager
  6. takethatthomas reblogged this from solitaryforager
  7. 4567898765 reblogged this from solitaryforager
  8. dirtydoctorgalapagos reblogged this from solitaryforager
  9. solitaryforager reblogged this from fyeahrichardheinberg
  10. fyeahrichardheinberg reblogged this from mikroblogolas
  11. mikroblogolas posted this